|

SHOP | SUBSCRIBE FREE | SEARCH | WP BLOG | ADD TO FAVORITES
Common Writing Mistakes
by Michael LaRocca
Most books aren't rejected because the stories are "bad." They're
rejected because they're not "ready to read." In short, minor stuff like
typos, grammar, spelling, etc.
I don't mean places where we, as authors, deliberately break the rules.
Those are fine. That's part of our job. Language always changes with use,
and we can help it on its way. No, I'm referring to places where someone
just plain didn't learn the rule or got confused or overlooked it during the
self-edits.
I've been editing novels for over three years. Looking back at my
experiences, I feel like sharing the most common mistakes I've seen. If
you'll go through your manuscript and fix these before you submit it to a
publisher, your odds of publication will increase dramatically.
Once you've found a publisher who publishes what you write, you want to
present yourself in the best way possible. Submitting an unedited manuscript
is a bit like going to a job interview wearing a purple Mohawk, no shoes,
torn jeans, and a dirty T-shirt. Your resume may be perfect, and your
qualifications impeccable, but something tells me you won't get the job.
The publisher is investing a lot in every book it accepts. E-publishers
tend to invest loads of time, and print publishers tend to invest an
advertising budget and the cost of carrying a large inventory. Why ask them
to invest hours and days of editing time as well? If the publisher gets two
or three or ten nearly identical books, you want yours to be the one
requiring the least editing.
The first thing you need to do, and I hope you've already done it, is use
the spelling and grammar checkers in your word processor. This will catch
many of the "common mistakes" on my list. But I've been asked to edit many
books where the author obviously didn't do this, and I confess that I may
well have been lazy and let a couple of mine get to my editors unchecked.
Bad Michael!
There are some other valuable lists at the following websites:
Here's a list of the mistakes I see most often.
Dialogue where everyone speaks in perfect
English and never violates any of the bullet points below. Okay, I made that
up. That's not really a common problem at all. But I have seen it, and it's
a terrible thing.
It's is a contraction for "it is" and its
is possessive.
Who's is a contraction for "who is" and
whose is possessive.
You're is a contraction for "you are" and
your is possessive.
They're is a contraction for "they are,"
there is a place, their is possessive.
There's is a contraction for "there is"
and theirs is possessive.
If you've been paying attention to the
above examples, you've noticed that possessive pronouns never use
apostrophes. Its, whose, your, yours, their, theirs...
Let's is a contraction for "let us."
When making a word plural by adding an s,
don't use an apostrophe. (The cats are asleep.)
When making a word possessive by adding
an s, use an apostrophe. (The cat's bowl is empty.)
A bath is a noun, what you take. Bathe is
a verb, the action you do when taking or giving a bath.
A breath is a noun, what you take.
Breathe is a verb, the action you do when taking a breath.
You wear clothes. When you put them on,
you clothe yourself. They are made of cloth.
Whenever you read a sentence with the
word "that," ask yourself if you can delete that word and still achieve
clarity. If so, kill it. The same can be said of all sentences. If you can
delete a word without changing the meaning or sacrificing clarity, do it.
"And then" is a phrase worth using your word processor's search feature to
look for.
Keep an eye on verb tenses. "He pulled
the pin and throws the grenade" is not a good sentence.
Keep an eye on making everything agree
regarding singular and plural. "My cat and my wife is sleeping," "My cat
sleep on the sofa," and "My wife is a beautiful women" are not good
sentences. (I exaggerate in these examples, but you know what I mean.)
I and me, he and him, etc. I hope no editor is rejecting any novels for
this one, because I suspect that most people get confused at times. In
dialogue, do whatever the heck you want because it sounds more "natural."
But for the sake of your narrative, I'll try to explain the rule and the
cheat. The rule involves knowing whether your pronoun is the subject or
object. When Jim Morrison of The Doors sings, "til the stars fall from the
sky for you and I," he's making a good rhyme but he's using bad grammar.
According to the rule, "you and I" is the object of the preposition "for,"
thus it should be "for you and me." The cheat involves pretending "you and"
isn't there, and just instinctively knowing "for I" just doesn't sound
right. (I think only native English speakers can use my cheat. For the
record, I have great admiration for authors writing in languages that aren't
their native tongues.)
Should of, would of, could of. This one can make me throw things. It's
wrong! What you mean is should have, would have, could have. Or maybe you
mean the contractions. Should've, would've, could've. And maybe 've sounds a
bit like of. But it's not! Of is not a verb. Not now, not ever.
More, shorter sentences are better.
Always. Don't ask a single sentence to do too much work or advance the
action too much, because then you've got lots of words scattered about like
"that" and "however" and "because" and "or" and "as" and "and" and "while,"
much like this rather pathetic excuse for a sentence right here.
On a similar (exaggerated) note: "He laughed a wicked laugh as he
kicked Ralphie in the face while he aimed the gun at Lerod and pulled the
trigger and then laughed maniacally as Lerod twisted in agony because of the
bullet that burned through his face and splattered his brains against the
wall and made the wall look like an overcooked lasagne or an abstract
painting." Now tell me this sentence isn't trying to do too much.
Too means also, two is a number, to is a
preposition.
He said/she said. Use those only when
necessary to establish who's speaking. They distract the reader, pulling him
out of the story and saying, "Hey look, you're reading a book." Ideally,
within the context of the dialogue, we know who's talking just by the style
or the ideas. When a new speaker arrives on the scene, identify him or her
immediately. Beyond that, keep it to a minimum. Oh yeah, and give every
speaker his/her own paragraph.
Billy-Bob smiled his most winning smile
and said, "What's a nice girl like you doing in a place like this?" I don't
like this. Use two shorter sentences in the same paragraph. Billy-Bob smiled
his most winning smile. "What's a nice girl like you doing in a place like
this?" Same effect, fewer words, no dialogue tag (he said).
In the previous example, I don't like "smiled his most winning smile,"
because it's redundant and also cliched. Please, if you find yourself
writing something like that, try to find a better way to express it before
you just give up and leave it like it is. During the self-edit, I mean, not
during the initial writing.
"The glow-in-the-dark poster of Jesus
glowed in the dark." This editor won't let that one go. Much too redundant,
and it appeared in a published novel.
Lie is what you do when you lie down on
the bed, lay is what you do to another object that you lay on the table.
Just to confuse matters, the past tense of lie is lay. Whenever I hit a
lay/lie word in reading, I stop and think. Do that when you self-edit.
(Note: Don't fix this one in dialogue unless your character is quite
well-educated, because most people say it wrong. I do.)
Beware of the dangling modifier. "Rushing
into the room, the exploding bombs dropped seven of the soldiers." Wait a
minute! The bombs didn't rush into the room. The soldiers did. To get all
technical about it, the first part is the "dependent clause," and it must
have the same subject as the "independent clause" which follows. Otherwise
it's amateur, distracting, and a real pain for your poor overworked editor.
If you are able (many readers are not), keep an eye out for missing
periods, weird commas, closing quotes, opening quotes, etc. When I read a
book, be it an ebook or a printed book, I can't help but spot every single
one that's missing. They slap me upside the head, which makes me a great
editor but a lousy reader. If you're like me, use that to your advantage. If
not, that's what editors are for!
Copyright © 2004 Michael LaRocca
Michael is an American who's lived
in Asia since 1999. He currently teaches English at Shaoxing University
in Zhejiang Province, China. He telecommutes to Hong Kong as a legal
transcriptionist, edits for Books Unbound, and he published four novels
in 2002. His
website will show you how to improve your writing, find the right
publisher, and promote your book after the sale. It explains why you
should never pay to be published. It has won two Sime~Gen Readers Choice
Awards and was listed in
Writers Digest's "The Best 101 Websites For Writers" in 2001 and
2002.
[
BOOKMARK THIS PAGE ]
|