<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons to Independently Publish Your Next Book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordpreneur.com/2009/05/5-reasons-to-independently-publish-your-next-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordpreneur.com/2009/05/5-reasons-to-independently-publish-your-next-book/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josephine Bacon</title>
		<link>http://www.wordpreneur.com/2009/05/5-reasons-to-independently-publish-your-next-book/comment-page-1/#comment-6093</link>
		<dc:creator>Josephine Bacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordpreneur.com/?p=2421#comment-6093</guid>
		<description>While I tend to agree that &quot;stuffed shirts in New York&quot; are astonishingly stupid when it comes to good books to publish, it is still vital to try and get your book published the old-fashioned way as it ads to your street cred. I am an author who has been published and I also self-published. I first published a book myself in 1983, because it was my translation of a rare book and I knew that if I proposed it to a publisher he would either a) say no outright (&quot;it&#039;s not our kind of book&quot;, &quot;it&#039;s not right for us&quot;, etc. etc.) or b) would say &quot;thanks for putting us wise to this, now take a hike!&quot; and give the translation to someone else. Some excellent books have been self-published (such as &quot;Becoming a Freelance Translator&quot;) have been self-published because publishers are too stupid to see the market for such a book, but I still don&#039;t think fiction ought to be self-published.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I tend to agree that &#8220;stuffed shirts in New York&#8221; are astonishingly stupid when it comes to good books to publish, it is still vital to try and get your book published the old-fashioned way as it ads to your street cred. I am an author who has been published and I also self-published. I first published a book myself in 1983, because it was my translation of a rare book and I knew that if I proposed it to a publisher he would either a) say no outright (&#8220;it&#8217;s not our kind of book&#8221;, &#8220;it&#8217;s not right for us&#8221;, etc. etc.) or b) would say &#8220;thanks for putting us wise to this, now take a hike!&#8221; and give the translation to someone else. Some excellent books have been self-published (such as &#8220;Becoming a Freelance Translator&#8221;) have been self-published because publishers are too stupid to see the market for such a book, but I still don&#8217;t think fiction ought to be self-published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
